FireWise Management

 

Community Emergency Preparedness Review

How prepared is my community?


Organization: Document completed by: 
Date:
SECTION QUESTION NO. QUESTION CHOICE POSSIBLE SCORE ACTUAL SCORE
1   Emergency Program & Legislative Requirements 800
  1-1 Does the organization have a clear, written program policy containing the following five (5) key elements?
       1. Enabling authority. 15
       2. A Strategic Plan defining the vision, mission statement, goals, objectives and milestones. 15
       3. Management policies and procedures. 15
       4. Applicable legislation, regulations, and industry codes of practice. 15
       5. Program budget and management schedules. 15
  1-2 Has council or board committed to providing policy guidence and direction to your local emergency management organization? 30
  1-3 Has the community passed a bylaw(s) authorizing the development of an emergency program? 75
  1-4 Does the bylaw include the authority to appoint an Executive Committee of Council comprised of two or more elected officials? 75
  1-5 Has an Executive Committee of Council been appointed? 75
  1-6 Does the bylaw include the authority to appoint an Emergency Planning Committee? 75
  1-7 Has an Emergency Planning Committee been appointed? 75
  1-8 Does the bylaw include the authority to appoint an Emergency Coordinator? 50
  1-9 Has an Emergency Coordinator been appointed? 50
  1-10 Have the duties of the Emergency coordinator been clearly established or set out in the bylaw or plan? 30
  1-11 Has the coordinator been provided with the appropriate level of authority or decision making ability? 30
  1-12 Does the bylaw allow for the allocation of financial support for extraordinary expenses incurred during emergency conditions? 30
  1-13 Do individuals responsible for the Emergency Management Program have access to, and understand "key" definitions and Standard Operating Procedures used throughout the program? 130
2   Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Analysis 800
  2-1 Has an HRVA advisory committee been established in the community that is supported by local government? 125
  2-2 Has the HRVA committee chair developed a workplan, schedule and draft public communications plan and presented this to the local government? 125
  2-3 Has the HRVA committee gathered hazard maps and information and used these to help identify hazards and develop plausible hazard scenarios? 125
  2-4 Does the hazard, risk and vulnerability assessment identify the following vulnerabilities:
       1. Vulnerable areas close to the hazard such as the routes by which hazardous materials are transported. 50
       2. Vulnerable populations such as people with health concerns, children or seniors. 50
       3. Out of date alert and notification plans or incomplete evacuation routes or plans. 50
       4. Incomplete hazard specific contingency plans. 50
  2-5 Does the hazard, risk and vulnerability assessment address the possibility of the simultaneous occurrence of different types of emergencies? 50
  2-6 Has a map been prepared showing known hazard locations, flood plains, transportation and evacuation routes? 50
  2-7 Has the HRVA committee assigned preliminary ranks to the relative magnitude of consequences of the hazards and contacted subject matter experts to help rank the likelihood of the hazards? 125
3   Risk Mitigation 800
  3-1 For each high risk hazard, have the vulnerabilities been documented and a list of action items to mitigate hazards been prioritized? 130
  3-2 Does the community have a mitigation strategy in place to reduce the risk from identified hazards, and address vulnerabilities and HRVA action items including plans for the preparation for, response to, and recovery from emergencies and disasters? 130
  3-3 Does the emergency plan reflect the hazards affecting the community and has the hazard analysis been shared with the community to increase awareness and preparedness? 130
  3-4 Are the emergency program elements and scope of the program determined by the hazards affecting the community? 130
  3-5 Were the following eleven (7) key areas were considered in the development of the risk mitigation strategy?
       1. The use of appropriate building construction standards and the relocation, retrofitting, or removal of structures at risk. 40
       2. Hazard avoidance through appropriate land use practices. 40
       3. Removal, reduction in size or elimination of the hazard. 40
       4. Segregation of the hazard from that which is to be protected. 40
       5. Control of the rate of release of the hazard. 40
       6. Provision of protective systems or equipment or redundancy of critical systems. 40
       7. Establishment of hazard warning, communication and evacuation procedures. 40
4   Preparedness
- Training/Drills/Exercises
800
  4-1 Do all key members of the Emergency Management Team attend regular emergency management training/drills, and participate in regular exercises with agency and business reps, e.g., participation by industries that manage hazards and businesses that maintain critical infrastructure 130
  4-2 Do ESS Director and ESS volunteers receive training, regularly participate in emergency management training/drills and exercises and attend planning meetings? 130
  4-3 Does an overall training and exercise schedule exist, from orientation seminars to full-scale exercises? 90
  4-4 Does a system exist for evaluating the effectiveness of training/drills/exercises? 90
  4-5 Are post-exercise debrief sessions held? 90
  4-6 Have post-exercise reports been completed with follow up actions of lessons learned? 90
  4-7 Has the community incorporated changes to the emergency management initiatives due to recommendations of lessons learned and identified through debrief sessions and post-exercise reports? 90
  4-8 Has the local executive council been notified of any changes to the program as a result of recommendations from debrief sessions or post-exercise reports? 90
5   Response 800
  5-1 Has the community developed a Response Plan to deal with the immediate and short-term effects of an emergency/disaster? 100
  5-2 Has the community consulted with the Provincial Emergency Program in plan development? 25
  5-3 Through the response planning process, has the community considered the following:
       1. The provision of contact numbers for the Provincial Emergency Program, to coordinate the response of provincial assistance if required. 25
       2. Including or liaison with neighbouring first nations communities. 25
       3. Mutual aid arrangements with neighbouring communities. 25
  5-4 Has the Emergency Coordinator presented the working plan to the Executive Committee appointed by the Council or Board to oversee the development and maintenance of the plan? 15
  5-5 Has the Executive Committee presented the plan to Council/Board for approval, after their review? 15
  5-6 Were opportunities provided for the public to be involved in the development of the plan? 25
  5-7 Does the plan include the following elements:
       1. Based on potential emergencies and disasters that could affect the area for which you jurisdiction is responsible. 25
       2. A concept of operations or Incident Command System with a clearly outlined chain of command, and guidelines for implementation, direction and control, through all levels of operation that is consistent with the BCERMS standard. 25
       3. A clear outline of who is to be called first if an event exceeds the capability of the first responders to the scene. 25
       4. Procedures by which physical and financial emergency resources or assistance may be obtained. 25
       5. Procedures by which emergency plans are to be implemented. 25
       6. Provisions for warning procedures to those persons who may be harmed or suffer loss in an emergency or impending disaster. 25
       7. Procedures to coordinate the provision of Emergency Social Services (ESS) food, clothing, shelter, transportation and medical service to victims of emergency and disasters. 25
       8. An evacuation plan. 25
  5-8 Has the community entered into mutual aid agreements with one or more other communities for emergency resources of any kind? 25
  5-9 Has the community developed the capability to implement these plans? 25
  5-10 Does the community have established reception centres for evacuated residents and/or to receive residents from a neighbouring community impacted by an emergency/disaster? 25
  5-11 Are there secondary/alternate locations for reception centres in the event that they become unusable? 25
  5-12 Have provisions been made for emergency power and lighting in all designated reception centres? 25
  5-13 Has the community approved and set up a community Emergency Operations Centre (EOC)? 25
  5-14 Has a secondary/alternate EOC location been designated should the primary EOC location become unusable? 25
  5-15 Do the designated primary and alternate EOC locations provide adequate measures of protection from hazards and have provisions been made to support continuity of operations? 25
  5-16 Have provisions been made and responsibility established for maintaining the EOC(s) in a state of readiness? 25
  5-17 Has the setup and operation of the EOC been exercised? 25
  5-18 Has the emergency plan identified who is responsible for overall command of emergency and disaster operations in the EOC? 25
  5-19 Have provisions been made for the inspection and/or testing of critical EOC equipment/facilities on a regular basis? 25
  5-20 Have provisions been made for emergency power and lighting in all EOC's? 25
  5-21 Have provisions been made to control access to the EOC by unauthorized personnel? 20
6   Recovery 800
  6-1 Has the community developed a Recovery Plan for an emergency/disaster? 275
  6-2 Does the plan include a procedure to establish priorities for restoring essential services provided by the community that are interrupted during an emergency or disaster? 175
  6-3 Does the plan include a procedure to establish priorities for restoring essential services not provided by the community that are interrupted during an emergency or disaster? 175
  6-4 Does the plan consider public and private business continuation? 175
7   Program Evaluation 800
  7-1 Has the community developed a review process to evaluate the local response to emergency/disaster? 350
  7-2 Is a report generated and given to council/board on the level of emergency preparedness for the community? 250
  7-3 If a report is generated, is it generated annually? 200

Version: April 12, 2002